CLOSE
Skip to Main Content
 
No magic wage rise: Wage response from pauses to the SG rate image
Reports

No magic wage rise: Wage response from pauses to the SG rate

Published: 29 Oct 2020

Pausing or cutting the Super Guarantee has left worker worse off as employers did not increase wages to compensate for lost super, an analysis of more than 8000 workplace agreements show. 

This Industry Super Australia briefing note explores what occurs when legislated increases in the SG are abandoned, as they were in 2014.

It examines wage outcomes struck in enterprise bargaining agreements (EBA’s) in the period when the scheduled increases were legally binding on employers when agreements were negotiated and then subsequently when they were not.

This analysis examines 8,370 agreements made in the period 2 January 2013 to 21 December 2018 

The key findings were:
• The average wages growth in agreements certified just before the 2013 election under the legislated schedule was around the same as agreements certified after the budget announcement to freeze the SG at 9.5 percent;
• The average remuneration increase (inclusive of wages and super) was higher for agreements certified before the 2013 election 3.57% p.a compared to 3.28% p.a for agreements after the freeze (a reduction of 0.29% p.a)
• Analysis of subsequent agreements shows there was no ‘catch up’ wage increase for agreements certified before the 2013 election compared to those certified afterwards;
• The wage outcomes observed in the different periods were not sensitive to the economic conditions.

Got a topic you'd like to read about?

Thank you for your topic suggestion.

The message has been sent succesfully, check back soon to find if we wrote about the topic you suggested.

An error has occurred

Due to a technical fault we are unable to to submit your form at the moment. Please try again later.

Additional details:

To learn more about one of the Industry SuperFunds below click on their logo.

I'M READY TO CHOOSE A FUND